JBOD stands for “Just a Bunch of Disks.” It describes a storage setup where multiple hard drives or SSDs are grouped in a single enclosure or system without any RAID configuration. Each disk operates independently and is recognized by the host system as a separate volume. JBOD provides raw, uncombined storage capacity without built-in redundancy or performance tuning. It is one of the most basic forms of disk aggregation and is used in various computing environments, including file servers, media servers, backups, and entry-level hosting platforms.
The JBOD approach is simple. It prioritizes storage flexibility and ease of use over speed, fault tolerance, or data protection. As a result, JBOD systems often rely on external software for tasks such as data replication, error recovery, or volume management.
The concept of JBOD (Just a Bunch of Disks) emerged during the 1990s as data centers and server farms expanded. At the time, storage systems needed simple ways to increase capacity without the complexity or cost of RAID. While RAID offered redundancy and performance, it also required:
In contrast, JBOD allowed administrators to:
JBOD systems became popular for:
In contrast to RAID, which combines multiple disks into one logical volume, JBOD keeps each disk as a separate entity. Some implementations allow combining drives into a single volume using linear concatenation, but this is not the default behavior and does not provide any redundancy.
As operating systems and software-defined storage technologies matured, JBOD configurations gained new flexibility. Tools like:
enabled administrators to treat JBOD arrays as dynamic storage pools, layering advanced features like snapshots, compression, and tiering—without requiring RAID at the hardware level.
Today, JBOD continues to be a useful option for low-cost, high-capacity storage needs, especially when paired with intelligent software.
In a JBOD configuration, multiple physical drives are connected to a host system. Each disk is mounted and accessed separately unless combined through software. There are two main ways JBOD is used:
Unlike RAID, JBOD does not mirror, stripe, or add parity to data. It does not improve performance through parallelism or protect against disk failure. Each drive in the system must be managed independently unless wrapped in a higher-level file system or software layer.
RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks) groups multiple drives into one logical volume using specific layouts for redundancy or speed. For example, RAID 1 mirrors data across drives for fault tolerance, while RAID 0 stripes data for speed.
In contrast, JBOD offers no redundancy or performance benefits by default. The advantage is flexibility. Any type or size of disk can be added to the system. The drives do not need to match in capacity or speed, and they can be used or removed individually.
JBOD is simpler and easier to manage in certain cases. It does not require complex controller settings or RAID metadata. However, it relies on the operating system or storage software to provide backup, replication, or recovery features.
JBOD is used in a variety of situations where raw storage capacity is more important than performance or redundancy.
JBOD hardware usually comes in the form of an enclosure with power supplies, fans, and a backplane. It connects to a host system via SATA, SAS, or other interfaces. The host sees each disk individually. These enclosures range from small desktop units with 4 drives to rack-mounted systems that hold 48 or more drives.
Many JBODs include management features such as:
They do not include RAID controllers or onboard processors. This makes them lighter and easier to integrate into custom software stacks.
While both terms share a similar name and design idea, their focus differs.
JBOD serves lower-cost, lower-performance roles. JBOF targets high-speed, enterprise storage needs.
In hosting platforms, JBOD is usually used where cost matters more than performance or resilience. It serves as storage for:
At NTC Hosting, we have tried using a JBOD Cluster for our main storage solution, but it was not cost-effective. We have since switched to a JBOF, which is superior to JBOD in almost every way and presents meaningful improvement for customers using our web hosting plans.